Article

Open Access

|

Peer-reviewed

Advancing Inclusive Education Research: Implementation Science, Intersectionality, and Longitudinal Evidence

Dr. Amita Joshi , Kiran Pately , Prof. Sambit Kumar Padhi

DIP: 18.02.711/20251004

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1004711

Received: November 02, 2025; Revision Received: November 15, 2025; Accepted: December 20, 2025

Abstract

As inclusive education systems mature globally, emerging research priorities reflect growing recognition of complexity, context-specificity, and equity imperatives shaping the field. This chapter synthesizes evolving research directions across multiple dimensions: implementation science examining mechanisms enabling successful inclusive practice adoption in diverse contexts; mixed-methods research bridging persistent research-practice gaps through integrated qualitative-quantitative approaches; longitudinal studies tracking student outcomes, transitions, and long-term effects across educational trajectories; intersectionality-focused research examining how neurodiversity intersects with race, gender, socioeconomic status, and sexuality to shape distinct marginalization experiences; and equity-centered research prioritizing disabled people’s leadership and voice in research design and dissemination. Critical research gaps persist regarding students with intellectual disabilities, sensory disabilities, and physical disabilities, who remain underrepresented in intervention research, with only 18% of studies addressing these populations compared to 50% focusing on specific learning disabilities. Emerging trends emphasize neurodiversity paradigms shifting from deficit-oriented to strengths-based frameworks, early identification and intervention research addressing barriers in diagnosis and support access, and technology integration examining digital accessibility and assistive technology effectiveness in inclusive settings. This chapter examines twelve priority research domains, identifies methodological advances needed, proposes a disability data equity research agenda, and articulates emerging frameworks including transformative mixed-methods research centering social justice imperatives. Future inclusive education research must prioritize implementation mechanisms, rigorous mixed-methods designs, longitudinal outcome tracking, intersectional approaches, disabled researcher leadership, and deliberate translation of findings into policy and practice benefiting all learners.

The author(s) appreciates all those who participated in the study and helped to facilitate the research process.

The author declared no conflict of interest.

This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Responding Author Information

Joshi, A., Pately, K. & Padhi, S.K. @ * Corresponding Email: amitajoshi73@gmail.com

Related Content
Advancing Inclusive Education Research: Implementation Science, Intersectionality, and Longitudinal Evidence

Total Download: 2 | Total View: 64

PlumX Matrix

Plum Analytics uses research metrics to help answer the questions and tell the stories about research. Research metrics that immediately measure awareness and interest give us new ways to uncover and tell the stories of research.

Dimensions Matrix

Dimensions is a next-generation linked research information system that makes it easier to find and access the most relevant information, analyze the academic and broader outcomes of research, and gather insights to inform future strategy. (digital science)

Article Overview

ISSN 2455-670X

DIP: 18.02.711/20251004

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1004711

Published in

Special Issue: Inclusive Education and Teacher Preparation in India

  • 2Downloads
  • 0Citations
  • 64Views
  • 0Likes
How to Cite
Print
Share
[DISPLAY_ULTIMATE_SOCIAL_ICONS]
Make a Submission