Communicative Verbal Communication Teaching Advance Capabilities for English Language Verbal Communication Teaching

Quantitative Study

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Communicative Verbal Communication Teaching Advance Capabilities for English Language Verbal Communication Teaching

Dr. V. Vijayalakshmi , Ms. A. Mahasundari

DIP: 18.02.031/20251002

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1002031

Received: June 12, 2025; Revision Received: June 18, 2025; Accepted: June 23, 2025

Abstract

In an increasingly interconnected world, the ability to communicate effectively in English—especially through spoken interaction—has become essential for academic, professional, and social success. This research paper investigates advanced instructional strategies designed to enhance communicative verbal proficiency among English language learners, particularly those at intermediate to advanced levels. While traditional English language instruction often focuses on grammar and written accuracy, this study shifts the focus to real-time spoken interaction, emphasizing fluency, coherence, and pragmatic appropriateness. Drawing on communicative language teaching (CLT), task-based language teaching (TBLT), and sociocultural theory, the paper presents a pedagogical framework that prioritizes authentic communication, contextual relevance, and active learner engagement. The research incorporates classroom-based interventions that utilize role-plays, simulations, discourse strategies, multimodal feedback, and cultural context training.Data collected from learners in controlled and experimental settings revealed that students exposed to interactive and reflective verbal training exhibited significant improvements in their ability to initiate, sustain, and conclude conversations, use appropriate stress and intonation patterns, and navigate complex communicative tasks such as debates, negotiations, and presentations. The study concludes that teaching advanced verbal communication requires a shift from prescriptive grammar drills to dynamic, meaning-focused instruction that mirrors real-life language use. It also suggests that instructors should be equipped with flexible tools and training to adapt to the communicative needs of diverse learners. The findings hold implications for curriculum designers, teacher educators, and policymakers aiming to cultivate globally competent English speakers capable of nuanced verbal communication.

Keywords

The author(s) appreciates all those who participated in the study and helped to facilitate the research process.

The author(s) declared no conflict of interest.

This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Responding Author Information

Dr. V. Vijayalakshmi @ rameshenglish1985@gmail.com

Communicative Verbal Communication Teaching Advance Capabilities for English Language Verbal Communication Teaching

Total Download: 1 | Total View: 73

PlumX Matrix

Plum Analytics uses research metrics to help answer the questions and tell the stories about research. Research metrics that immediately measure awareness and interest give us new ways to uncover and tell the stories of research.

Dimensions Matrix

Dimensions is a next-generation linked research information system that makes it easier to find and access the most relevant information, analyze the academic and broader outcomes of research, and gather insights to inform future strategy. (digital science)

Article Overview

ISSN 2455-670X

DIP: 18.02.031/20251002

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1002031

Published in

Volume 10 Issue 2, April – June, 2025

1Downloads
0Citations
73Views
0Likes

Navigations
References

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583

Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2012). The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Pearson Education.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Emerging technologies: Global reach and local practice: The promise of mobile technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15. https://doi.org/10125/44397

Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326. https://‌doi.‌org/10.1080/09588220500335455

Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.319

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. Yale University Press.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Longman.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.