Punctuation Learning Techniques and Language Structure Learning Procedures: Would They Say They are Connected?

Analysis Research

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Punctuation Learning Techniques and Language Structure Learning Procedures: Would They Say They are Connected?

Dr. S. Ramesh , Dr. P. Jeyasankar , Mr. S. Rajasekar

DIP: 18.02.028/20251002

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1002028

Received: May 28, 2025; Revision Received: June 14, 2025; Accepted: June 20, 2025

Abstract

This study answers various calls for research on Sentence structure Learning Systems (GLS), a region that has been dismissed for quite a long time. The examination reveals insight into the connection between language structure learning or informative methodologies and understudies’ use of GLS doled out to foster express and understood information on punctuation. Two sub-classifications of Pawlak’s (2018) Punctuation Learning Procedure Stock (GLSI) were utilized to survey GLS use in these two sub-classifications by understudies who favor express sentence structure learning and the people who lean toward verifiable language learning. A Pearson connection coefficient test was led to look at this relationship. The review uncovered a moderate utilization of GLS for creating unequivocal and implied punctuation information. Moreover, it saw as an immaterial, delicate, and negative relationship between punctuation learning or informative methodologies and GLS used to foster express information on sentence structure. Additionally, an immaterial, extremely feeble, and negative relationship was accounted for between language structure learning or educational methodologies, and GLS used to foster implied information on syntax. The review talks about factors affecting language learning and GLS use and features the limits.

Keywords

The author(s) appreciates all those who participated in the study and helped to facilitate the research process.

The author(s) declared no conflict of interest.

This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Responding Author Information

Dr. S. Ramesh @ rameshenglish1985@gmail.com

Punctuation Learning Techniques and Language Structure Learning Procedures: Would They Say They are Connected?

Total Download: 3 | Total View: 70

PlumX Matrix

Plum Analytics uses research metrics to help answer the questions and tell the stories about research. Research metrics that immediately measure awareness and interest give us new ways to uncover and tell the stories of research.

Dimensions Matrix

Dimensions is a next-generation linked research information system that makes it easier to find and access the most relevant information, analyze the academic and broader outcomes of research, and gather insights to inform future strategy. (digital science)

Article Overview

ISSN 2455-670X

DIP: 18.02.028/20251002

DOI: 10.25215/2455/1002028

Published in

Volume 10 Issue 2, April – June, 2025

3Downloads
0Citations
70Views
0Likes

Navigations
References

Aljohani, M. A. S. (2012). Grammar beliefs of in-service teachers. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 11(1), 96-108. Almuhammadi, A. (2020). Teaching grammar: Professional needs of Saudi EFL instructors. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n3p14

Al-Seghayer, K. (2011). English teaching in Saudi Arabia: Status, issues, and challenges. Hala.

Althaqafi, A. S. (2018). A Critical Review of Grammar Teaching Methodologies in the Saudi Context. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 65-73. https://doi.org/10‌.5539‌/‌elt‌.‌v‌11n‌11p65

Anderson, N. J., & Vandergrift, L. (1996). Increasing metacognitive awareness in the L2 classroom by using think-aloud protocols and other verbal report formats. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies around the World: Crosscultural Perspectives (pp. 176-192). University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.151‌5/978‌082‌‌‌4897‌376-002

Bade, M. (2008). Grammar and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 266-281). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org‌/10.10‌17/CBO97‌80511497667.016

Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.). (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.)‌.‌ Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.101‌7/S02671‌905‌‌0‌‌5000061

Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.),

Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Cohen, A. D., & Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170–190). Edward Arnold.

Cohen, A. D., & Griffiths, C. (2015). Revisiting LLS research 40 years later. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 414-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.225

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.) (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2002). Language Strategy Use Survey. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. Retrieved fromhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1nGerc0LJV1ZWT2BwZms4iTaKRbq0ads/view

DeKeyser, R. (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of L2 grammar: A pilot study. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587210

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor

Ellis, N. C. (1995). Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments. Language Awareness, 4(3), 123-146. https://doi.org/‌10.‌1080/‌09‌658416.1995.9959876

Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. (pp. 155-179). Erlbaum.

Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19-45.

Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 7-25.

Grenfell, M., & Harris V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Routledge.

Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699428

Griffiths, C., & Oxford R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction‌ to this special issue. System, 43, 1-10. https://‌doi.‌org/‌‌10.10‌16/j.system.2‌013.‌‌12.0‌09

Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.101‌7/S0‌272263‌105‌‌050084

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 3, 251-266.

Littlewood, W. (1992). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Macaro, E. (2009). Developments in language learner strategies. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary Applied Linguistics (pp. 10-36). Continuum.

National Capital Language Resource Centre (NCLRC) (2000). Elementary immersion students’ perceptions of language learning strategies use and self-efficacy. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445521.pdf

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. ‌Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.‌1017/CBO‌978113‌95244‌90‌

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle and Heinle/Cengage. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language ‌learning strategies. Longman.

Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146

Oxford, R., Gu, P., Gunning, P., & Hernández González, T. (2024). Considerations in designing and validating the Diagnostic Inventory for Self-Regulated Language Learning (DISLL): Status of the process. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 41, 4-20. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.41.02

Oxford. R. L., Lee, R. L., & Park, G. (2007). L2 grammar strategies: The second Cinderella and beyond. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 117-139). Oxford University Press.

Park, G. (1995). Language learning strategies and beliefs about language learning of university students learning English in Korea. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Pawlak, M. (2013). Researching grammar learning strategies: Combining the macro- and micro-perspective. In L. Salski, W. Szubko-Sitarek, & J. Majer (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign language learning (pp. 191–220). University of Lódź Press.